The monitors and echo station: format and timing
Why examiners ask this
This is the one OSCE station where nobody talks back to you. Three timed scenarios play on a screen with a facilitator in the room, a question follows each, and you have roughly 60 seconds to answer before the next clip starts; published practice modules built to the ABA timing use exactly this structure, with a monitor that moves from baseline to an altered state over about a minute and two questions: the most likely diagnosis and the features that support it.1,2 It tests whether you can read a monitor or an echo loop the way a consultant does at the head of the bed: name the finding, name the cause, say what you do. It stresses application of knowledge and organization; there is no credit for adaptability because there is no dialogue to adapt to.
The 60-second answer
I treat every clip with the same routine. The first ten seconds I orient: which monitor or which echo view, what the patient context on the card tells me, and what is abnormal. I then say three things in order. The finding, in plain monitor language: "end-tidal CO2 has fallen from 38 to 12 over four breaths with a preserved waveform shape." The physiology behind it: "that is a sudden loss of pulmonary blood flow, not a ventilation problem." The action: "I tell the surgeon, go to 100% oxygen, check the pressure and the pulse, and treat for embolism or arrest." I stop there. Plan on the clip playing once with no going back to an earlier scenario, so I do not narrate while it runs; I watch, then speak.1 I use the remaining seconds to add the one differential that would change my plan.
Decision points and the "why"
- Read the context card before the clip — the card tells me the case (sitting craniotomy, laparoscopy, cardiac bypass) and that context ranks my differential before I see a single waveform. The same capnography drop means embolism in a sitting case and disconnect in a prone one.
- Name the parameter and the direction, not the diagnosis first — a candidate who says "air embolism" before saying "the end-tidal CO2 fell" has skipped the step that earns the point. The grader is checking that I recognized the monitor change.
- One physiology sentence — the facilitator's question is often "what is the most likely cause?"; the answer is one mechanism, not a list. I give the most likely cause and the single most dangerous alternative.
- Action in order of what kills first — oxygen, circulation, call for help, specific therapy. If the clip shows a rhythm, I say whether I would shock it. If it shows a pressure, I say the number I am treating toward.
- Echo clips get a view statement first — the outline names 11 standard TEE views plus point-of-care views, two-dimensional with or without color flow and M-mode, and no pulsed-wave or continuous-wave Doppler;3 "this is a midesophageal four-chamber view" or "subcostal view" precedes any finding, because the facilitator is grading whether I can orient on the screen. Then the chamber, then the abnormality.
- Silence is allowed — a wrong guess in the first five seconds costs more than a four-second pause. I watch the whole loop before I open my mouth.
The complication they will inject
The third scenario combines a monitor and an echo. The screen shows a falling blood pressure, a rising central venous pressure, and a transgastric short-axis view with a small, hyperdynamic left ventricle and a dilated right ventricle. The trap is answering only half. I say the monitor finding (hypotension with high filling pressures), the echo finding (right ventricular dilation with a flattened septum and an underfilled left ventricle), and the unifying diagnosis (acute right ventricular failure from pulmonary embolism or air). Then the action: 100% oxygen, inotropic support with epinephrine, avoid fluid loading an already full right heart, and call for help. The other version of the inject is a clip where the image quality is poor or the loop is shorter than I expected. I state what I can see, name what I cannot exclude, and say the next view or monitor I would ask for; that answer scores better than an invented finding.
Pitfalls that cost points
- Talking over the clip and missing the second half of the change.
- Diagnosing before describing; the finding is the scored item.
- Giving a differential of six when the question asked for the most likely cause.
- Forgetting the context card and answering as if the patient were healthy.
- Running out of time on the action step because the physiology explanation ran long.
Rapid-why
Q: How long do I have per scenario? A: About 60 seconds per question; the whole station is up to 8 minutes, with 4 minutes to study the stem beforehand and a two-minute warning bell at 6 minutes.2
Q: Will the clip replay if I ask? A: Do not count on it. Practice modules modeled on the station never allow going back,1 so I watch first and speak second.
Q: Does the facilitator respond to my answer? A: Do not expect it. Sessions are recorded for grading,2 and the station is not a dialogue, so I do not wait for a nod.
Q: What if I cannot identify the echo view? A: I describe the structures I can see, the chamber orientation, and the abnormality, then name the most likely view; partial credit for a correct finding beats silence.
Numbers to know
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Station length | Up to 8 minutes; 7 stations in all2 |
| Stem read | 4 minutes before entering |
| Warning bell | 2 minutes remaining, at 6 minutes |
| Scenarios per station | 3, each played once |
| Answer window | ~60 seconds per question |
| Echo views in scope | 11 TEE3, 5 POCUS cardiac |
| New monitor items | Quantitative neuromuscular blockade and fetal heart rate, testing from 20263 |
Links
- OSCE day: stations, timing, who is in the room, Monitor atlas: perioperative cardiac events, Monitor atlas: perioperative respiratory events, Capnography: waveforms and sudden loss of ETCO2
- Atlas: The 11 TEE views; The 5 POCUS cardiac views
- ABA APPLIED Examination OSCE content outline (current edition)
Sources
- 1.Modules for the Technical Skills Section of the OSCE Component of the American Board of Anesthesiology APPLIED Examination · MedEdPORTAL (PubMed Central), 2019 · pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govPractice modules built to mirror ABA timing; not an ABA description of the live station.
- 2.APPLIED Exam Manual · ABA, 2026 · theaba.orgRevised July 2026; OSCE timing, signals and room personnel.
- 3.OSCE Content Outline · ABA · theaba.org
Facts on this page were checked against these sources on Oct 14, 2026. Guidelines change; confirm doses against current institutional protocols.